My first impression, and whenever I have been asked this question I have been convinced of this, is that the Premier League is quicker and has bigger physical demands than the Spanish championship, and that La Liga is more technical and tactical.
I think that most football fans who are acquainted with both leagues will think the same thing, but, looking at the data we have received from companies such as Opta (who analyse more matches) and Amisco, and having read some published articles on the subject, we decided to do this analysis.
The first thing you have to take in to account is that according to the criteria used by these companies to define the parameters, the data can be different. For example, to count blocked shots as a shot or not completely changes the statistics. The same applies to the speed of the players; a sprint can be defined as over 21km/h or over 24km/h, which obviously changes the analysis.
To avoid the problem, having compared the data, we decided to use the most reliable data and present it in the clearest possible way; so the study will not have any scientific value but will give us a more objective idea of the 2010-11 season in both leagues.
From a Technical Point of View.
The first data we analysed showed only small differences in time of ball in play, 53 minutes in La Liga and 54 minutes in the Premier League last season.
|La Liga||Attack||Premier League|
|2.74||Average goals per game||2.79|
|15||Average shots per game||18|
|17%||% of headed goals||19%|
|35%||% of Set Play goals||34%|
The goals average is slightly better in the Premier League, 2.79 goals per game compared to 2.74 in La Liga.
The average number of shots per game, 18 in the Premier League compared to 15 in La Liga, has been the same for the last 2 seasons. It stands out that La Liga players are more accurate in shooting, 45% compared to 36% in the Premier League.
There is little difference in headed goals, 17% compared to 19%.
The percentage of goals from Set Plays was higher in the Premier League, 37% compared to 29%, in the 2009-10 season whereas in 2010-11 it was 35% in La Liga compared to 34% in the Premier League.
|La Liga||Passing||Premier League|
|819||Passes per game||801|
|23%||% of long passes||26%|
|489||Passes in Opposition Half||494|
|258||Passes in Final Third||276|
|66%||Accuracy of passes in Final Third||62%|
|27||Crosses per game||33|
The number of passes per game is similar for the last 2 seasons in both leagues, although slightly higher in the Spanish league. There is not a significant difference.
More long passes in the Premier League, more in the opposition half and also more in the final third, but with less accuracy. This may be due to the fact that in the Premier League many of these passes came from the goalkeeper. Similarly, more crosses in the Premier League over the last 2 seasons.
|La Liga||General Play||Premier League|
|38||Dribbles per game||33|
|42||Final Third entries per game||56|
In La Liga, they dribble more and with more success in the Premier League.
Higher number of challenges in the Premier League, and this is an important factor when we consider the disciplinary data.
|La Liga||Discipline||Premier League|
|19||Fouls per game||17|
|5||Number of Fouls between cards||7|
More tackles in the Premier League, fewer fouls given and fewer cards shown in relation to the number of fouls given, clearly indicates that the Premier League is more physical than La Liga.
The systems used are similar, 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3, 4-4-1-1 and 4-4-2, in both leagues. The quality of the team dictates their style. In Spain, they look more to pass and support, but in England, whilst there are also many teams who try to move the ball on the ground, generally the play is more direct, as we have seen in the long pass data and the entries to the opposition area, reflected in the shots attempted and goals scored.
Physical Data Analysis.
This is the latest data we compiled from Amisco and you can see the prevalence of La Liga compared to the Premier League. However, in another study as well as in our own collected data from different seasons in both leagues, we do not see the same results. Due to the low number of matches from which this data was collected because there was no specialised equipment, the data may not be absolutely 100% accurate. Therefore we consider the data we directly collected to be more reliable, and thus we believe that in the Premier League they run more and more quickly than in La Liga.
|La Liga||Distance Covered||Premier League|
|10508||Distance covered (m)||10494|
|273||Distance in sprint (+24 km/h)||264|
|322||High Speed (21-24 km/h)||297|
|Our Data from other Seasons|
|11072||Total Distance covered||11174|
In another study, our conclusion is corroborated and confirms that in the Premier League, they run more, more in high intensity (blue) and more in sprints (see graphic).
This is influenced as much by the tempo of the game as by the duels, fouls, cards and challenges in general.
As we can see in the graphic, the Premier League is much more demanding in terms of physical contact, both on the ground and in the air, and in our experience, we know that the English fans demand intensity and high tempo, so, from a psychological point of view, the game is more demanding in the Premier League.
If you hide, you won’t survive in the Premier League, something that the following graphic of aerial and ground duels (blue) suggests.
Confrontations in Recent Years.
The only reliable references to compare teams in the Premier League and La Liga are Champions League meetings, although Atletico Madrid beating Liverpool in the semi-final and then Fulham in the final of the Europa League also stands out.
In the Champions League, going back to season 2008-9, we have the victory of Arsenal against Villarreal (4-1 over 2 legs) and Liverpool over Real Madrid (5-0) with obvious English superiority.
But also, Barcelona beat Chelsea in the semis, and later United (2-0) in the final to become champions.
In 2010-11, Real Madrid beat Tottenham (5-0) and Barcelona beat Arsenal (4-3) and then United (3-1) in the final, showing the Spanish teams’ superiority.
These results show us the equality of both leagues, and today, the superiority of Barcelona, with their style based on possession, which the Spanish National team uses, as well the younger teams, with good results in all competitions.
Analysing the data, we see that the technical aspects, the systems of play and also the tactics, are becoming similar in both leagues due to the continental influence in the Premier League. We can also appreciate that the speed and intensity of play and the physical contact are the biggest differences between the 2 leagues.
As far as the European meetings go, it is significant that continental referees give more free kicks and show more cards than in the Premier League (proved by the number of fouls and cards in La Liga) which can affect the performance of English teams in Europe.
However, whenever discussing this question, I think the simple answer is:
The tope 8-10 teams in the Premiership are better than the top 8-10 sides in La Liga
Premiership = much more competitive = better!
Good luck with everything Rafa - i still wear a t-shirt with your face in a Che Guevara-style image, along with the words 'In Rafa We Trust'!
You gave us back our pride as fans & we can never ever forget that.
Keep up the great work, YNWA.
The theory is that Barcelona, in particular, play and press with a very high line, looking to pressurise the opponent's defence. I wonder how this is replicated in the rest of La Liga, and in the Premier League.
Can an assumption also be made that referees are therefore influenced by the media and public, when deciding on whether to penalise a player with a card? This could also have an effect when English teams play on the continent?